🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding that comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Rather, he invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the world in succession. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of American men winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a horrendous service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to use excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly seem like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {