🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.